[Federated-fs] Proposed agenda for today's call (9/18)

[spencer shepler]

I would suggest that all discussions end up on the nfsv4 wg
alias given that the functionality will eventually land somewhere
or have some impact on the federated naming drafts and
protocols.

Spencer

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:34 PM, James Lentini <jlentini at netapp.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, spencer shepler wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:12 AM, James Lentini <jlentini at netapp.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Please let me know if you have additional agenda items.
>> >
>> >    Time: Thursdays 1:30-2:30 PM EST/10:30-11:30 AM PST
>> >  Dial-in: 1-888-765-3653 # 2354843
>> >
>> > Proposed Agenda
>> > ---------------
>> > + root fileset
>> >
>> > + multi-protocol support
>> >
>> > + IETF NFSv4 WG Charter
>>
>> I mentioned this to James in off-list email but as everyone
>> knows, the work/ideas developed around federated-fs have
>> been well received within the NFSv4 WG and by our
>> area advisor.  Brian and I have details to work through
>> for the charter update but that should not delay the
>> protocol definition, etc.  I suggested to James that the
>> current I-Ds be resubmitted at NFSv4 WG I-Ds.  This
>> means their names need to change to something like:
>> draft-ietf-nfsv4-
>> and will start at draft version "00".
>>
>> Once they are submitted I will approve and we can move
>> the discussions over to the nfsv4 at ietf.org working group
>> alias.
>>
>> Spencer
>>
>
> Spencer,
>
> This is great news. We are all excited about moving the FedFs working
> inside the NFSv4 working group.
>
> Recently we've been discussing how FedFs could be used to create a
> federated CIFS namespace. Where would you recommend we discuss this
> topic?
>
> We could continue to use this mailing list as a forum for the
> CIFS-related discussions and concentrate exclusively on the NFS issues
> on the nfsv4 at ietf.org mailing list.
>