[Federated-fs] FedFS Minutes, 8/21/2008
James Lentini
jlentini at netapp.com
Thu Aug 21 16:53:27 PDT 2008
FedFS Minutes, 8/21/2008
------------------------
Attendees
---------
Renu Tewari (IBM/ARC)
James Lentini (NetApp)
Paul Lemahieu (EMC)
Manoj Naik (IBM/ARC)
Minutes
-------
+ Precisely specifying LDAP types
During the meeting last week, Dan lamented that the drafts do not
define the LDAP NSDB types more precisely. Stronger types would
keep many invalid values out of the LDAP database (e.g. a field
containing an IP address would at least be syntactically valid).
James Lentini is researching if this is possible.
Paul will ask Mario if he has any pointers on this subject.
Do we need do the error checking on the LDAP?
We observed that there will still be error checking necessary
by the server/admin utility.
Renu noted that RFC 2307: An Approach for Using LDAP as a Network
Information Service could be a good example of how to define the
types more precisely.
+ Push vs Pull for master root fileset replicas
We decided in previous meetings that the file servers will
pull the master root fileset.
The open issue is how to efficiently determine what has changed
(what are the deltas?).
+ How do other protocols, such as CIFS and DFS, make use of FedFS?
We came up with several questions:
Should the NSDB return different answers for an NFS exported fs
versus and CIFS exported fs?
Can Active Directory be used as an NSDB? And if so, how?
For a Windows environment, we should be careful about requiring
Active Directory usage. Typically, the Active Directory administrators
and the storage administrators are different people.
Along the same lines, we don't want to require Active Directory.
We will research the mechanism CIFS uses to implement referrals and what
information MS DFS stores in active directory (the MS DFS documentation
has information on this).
+ Agenda items for next week:
- LDAP transactions
- Feedback on Dan's changes to NSDB Protocol document
More information about the Federated-fs
mailing list